....you just know you're in for a deception-filled feast of fun about Bolivia. What follows those opening lines is pretty much as you'd expect, laying heavily on anti-Evo BS, slipping cute words like 'autocrat' in there and trying to make out that all the opposition press has been doing in Bolivia is highlighting cases of government corruption. No mention about the racism or support for illegal separatists, or revisionist histories about the Pando Massacre or the innocent chats Ruben Costas enjoyed with then US ambassador Goldberg. All those squeaky-clean reporters have have doing is fighting the good fight against graft.
But the name of the journalist caught my eye, John Enders. It rang a bell so I Googled it. It turns out it rang a bell for a different reason (another John Enders was involved with developing the polio vaccine), but I did chance upon our John Enders' sparse little blog. In it we find out just how little he knows about Bolivia when he opines:
Say whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat? Let's do a bit of deconstruction on his views about Bolivia and Evo:
In Bolivia, socialist Evo Morales is a smart fellow
Well, yes he is
and, like most Latin American radicals, doesn’t necessarily believe all of his own rhetoric.
Got some proof of that, John? I'd say he's come to power calling the same tune all the way and has kept his promises, too. What makes you think Evo says one thing and believes another? An example, please.
He is caught between those who want to return the country to the statist ways of the 1950s
Errr, no. He has the democratic majority vote support of people who are fed up with being ripped off by big business. We're talking about the country that made collecting rainwater illegal to make sure Bechtel's concession on the privatized water supply got maximum bang-per-buck. We're talking about the country that has put eight point five billion dollars in its currency reserves since nationalizing the oil&gas industry. Previously that cash just left the country in its abject poverty. The Morales government's "statist ways" include giving an old age pension to its senior citizens for the first time ever. Get that? EVER.
.........and those eastern Bolivia business interests who seek to create a capitalist mecca.
ROFL! Create a capitalist mecca? OH MY GOD! Don't you mean "create a new Kosovo"? The eastern Bolivians of which you speak have majority control over one city, not a whole region. They are racist, fascist, nazi-worshipping thugs that use indigenous populations as slave labour (that's not my opinion, that's The United Nations' opinion). That your idea of capitalism around Oregon way, John?
Evo already has learned he cannot dictate radical change to his people without widespread and violent opposition.
Evo has learned that to finally reach a level of emancipation for ALL Bolivians, the 10% of people that have hoarded 90% of the pie for generations kick and scream. As for "widespread", you make it sound like all the country hates his reforms. Errr....check every single national vote again, Johnnyboy.
Washington should give him limited support for social reforms, continue to maintain contacts with the opposition and wait for a more moderate, transitional figure in Bolivia to surface as Morales’ successor.
...and why the devil should they do that, Enders? Come on, why not elaborate on why the USA should keep its nose stuck in other country's affairs?
Enders' journalism and opinions, after "30 years of covering Latin America", show the insight of a fruitfly. And thus, John, you receive this week's coveted award. Enjoy it, dumbass:

![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)

11 comments:
Excellent post. It seems unreal how unfair our Latin American society is. Colombia, Haiti and Bolivia are top ten in inequality and poor wealth distribution. Our society reflects more the realities of feudalism than those of the 21st century.
Enders, a journalist? More like a CIA plant, given that he writes for the Miami Whore and everything he writes seems calculated to confirm that "The American Way" is the ONLY way, and that any alternative to it must fail. I tawt I taw a MOCKINGBIRD!
But in the unlikely event that he isn't CIA, he's still definitely a dumbass.
When someone (especially an American, sad to say) describes themselves thusly 'INDEPENDENT, NON-IDEOLOGICAL' it's always fun, I like this quote from his piece-
"the most important opportunity in the region for American influence"
That's not non ideological or independent that's pretty well much unthinking imperialism, just smell the entitlement. And as America has two parties devoted to neoliberalism that conclusively torpedoes his non ideological dance. And given the history of slaughter & torture that regimes fully supported by the US have engaged in, it's frankly in appallingly bad taste.
And shock horror he thinks Chavez is a tin pot dictator (ooh those elections he won must have been cunning Truman Show like constructs) then the happy ending-
"Washington’s relations with Latin America are both critical and complex, and they are fraught with risk and potential reward. Several considered steps by a new Obama Administration would show Latin America that Washington means to play a different game. Closing the infamous prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, renewing full diplomatic relations with Cuba, reviewing the efficacy of the “War on Drugs,” and restoring our commitment to a prosperous, democratic and sovereign Latin America, all would be big steps forward."
I just don't think 'prosperous, democratic and sovereign Latin America' means to him what it means to those people actually citizens in LatAm, at least he outs his position in the beginning-
"From Argentina to Venezuela, Bolivia to Nicaragua, and Chile to Paraguay, so-called “leftist” and left-of-center governments are in the ascendancy. Economic stagnation, poverty and political instability are endemic."
So what he calls 'prosperous, democratic and sovereign Latin America' seems to mean willing to be allies with Washington and not too 'lefty'. He sort of seems to mean well in that disastrous way that doesn't realise the US is not a beacon of light but historically has been the harbinger of doom. Like a 'welcome us with open-arms and flowers' level of patriotic delusion.
PS. Why am I telling you this, you read it too! Hmmm, oh well nevermind just finding more signs of his silliness that were too obvious not to remark upon.
Rick,
When you use the word "Americans", are you including Canadians, Guatemalans, Chileans, Paraguayans, Venezuelans, Colombians, etc etc?
Or maybe you were referring to US citizens. Easy mistake to make, my friend :-)
Oops, I mean Yanqui's!
Isn't it that journalists should be unbiased?, or at least try to be, how he could write so blatantly skewed statements!!!
He should be fired or at least not to write about LAtAm!!
A response: First, I find your comment about "blue-eyed whitey" offensive and racist. Second, you seem to confuse the opinion piece on the blog with the Herald piece on the media in Bolivia. I stand by both. And third: If you have to stoop to ugly personal attacks, it usually means your argument isn't very strong. John Enders
Again you show you total lak of insight. Reply coming today. Special post for you, john.
Dear John (geddit?)
http://incakolanews.blogspot.com/2009/05/john-enders-lets-not-be-too-harsh-on.html
Ah, blogs are lovely things aren't they? All the hacks writing for the mainstream press should be required to keep one. That way no-one would have to guess at the reporters' ideological prejudices (tho' it's not that hard) - they could just be spelled out in the form of a 7th grader's essay.
Of course I'm laughing my ass off at this:
"We should help Cubans define their own future, let go of the anti-communist past, and embrace them as friends."
Because everyone knows that Cubans are like little kids really, which is why they need big brothers, or dads, to "help" them. And hey, as far as the 50 years of U.S. sponsored mercenary attacks on Cuba and an economic blockade that has needlessly impoverished generations of Cubans? Let's just let it go. A little harmless anti-communism, that's all it was.
I'll go with Bina on this one.
This guy is clearly a fuckwit and I applaud your response to him. I'm afraid you got a detail wrong, though: Bonosol, the old age pension, was around before Evo. In fact, I think it was a brainchild of Goni's administration. Yeah, I know, it's pretty surprising but he did come up with _some_ good stuff before killing all those people. What Evo did was increase the Bonosol, fighting tooth and nail against the medialunatics who wanted to channel the oil and gas revenues earmarked for it into their own coffers. But Evo won - yaye - and now the derisorily small Bonosol is a slightly more respectable Renta Dignidad. The end. But other than that, yeah, give it to 'em with both barrels.
Post a Comment